icon
沙特阿拉伯王国政府所属的官方政府网站。
icon 周四 25 6月 2026
icon
沙特官方政府网站的域名以下列后缀结尾 gov.sa

沙特阿拉伯王国所有政府机构的官方网站均以 .gov.sa 结尾。

icon
政府网站使用以下协议。 HTTPS 用于加密和安全。

沙特阿拉伯王国所有政府机构的官方网站均以 .gov.sa 结尾。

icon
在数字政府管理局注册,编号:
20250831619
建议

Use of oral prednisolone or naproxen for the treatment of gout arthritis

Use of oral prednisolone or naproxen for the treatment of gout arthritis

icon التاريخ: 2008-06-04
نوع المواضيع: General Health

<p>
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and colchicine used to treat gout arthritis have gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular adverse effects. Systemic corticosteroids might be a beneficial alternative. We investigated equivalence of naproxen and prednisolone in primary care. </p>
<p>We did a randomised clinical trial to test equivalence of prednisolone and naproxen for the treatment of monoarticular gout. Primary-care patients with gout confirmed by presence of monosodium urate crystals were eligible. 120 patients were randomly assigned with computer-generated randomisation to receive either prednisolone (35 mg once a day; n=60) or naproxen (500 mg twice a day; n=60), for 5 days. Treatment was masked for both patients and physicians. The primary outcome was pain measured on a 100 mm visual analogue scale and the a priori margin for equivalence set at 10%. Analyses were done per protocol and by intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN14648181.</p>
<p>Data were incomplete for one patient in each treatment group, so per-protocol analyses included 59 patients in each group. After 90 h the reduction in the pain score was 44·7 mm and 46·0 mm for prednisolone and naproxen, respectively (difference 1·3 mm; 95% CI −9·8 to 7·1), suggesting equivalence. The difference in the size of change in pain was 1·57 mm (95% CI −8·65 to 11·78). Adverse effects were similar between groups, minor, and resolved by 3 week follow-up.</p>
<p>Oral prednisolone and naproxen are equally effective in the initial treatment of gout arthritis over 4 days.<br /><br /></p>
<p><font face="Calibri"><strong><font size="3"><i>The Lancet</i> 2008; 371:1854-1860</font></strong></font></p>